Wednesday 17 December 2008

 
close up of eye with photomanipulation to intensify light/dark- sepia tones and colour adjustments- textural as well as portraiture?
Photomanipulation- I gave myself wings!

Rankin Analysis

[im00223.jpg]
Rankin, "Obsessive Behaviour" , Dazed & Confused magazine, Nov '96

1. what are the photographers aims?
To portray Robbie as the 'cheeky chappy' that he is by putting him on the front of some girl's knickers. 
2. Who is the image for? More than one audience?
I think it is for fans of Robbie and for himself as well as the photographer who has been able to keep his signature 'white background' while displaying the humorous side of the subject. 
3. Does the image successfully communicate the photographers aims and intentions? 
Yes, it is a striking image and can be seen as humorous

Analysing the image.
1. What type of photography is this? documentary, reportage, portrait, fine art, advertising, editorial?
Advertising..? But in an artistic way.
2. What is included in the photograph?
A belly button, girl's knickers, Robbie's face
3. What message does it convey? 
That Robbie is a humorous character which is visible from the expression he is pulling and the way he has been placed in the photo
4. What techniques do you think have been used to make the image?
Careful lighting/ positioning of the model and Photoshop touch ups
5. Has the image been staged?
Definitely
6. Has the image been manipulated in any way?
Possibly, it is difficult to tell whether the photo on the knickers has been printed on or taken separately and added in photoshop

Personal Response.
1. How does the image make you feel? 
It is a humorous picture, not particularly emotive but it did catch my eye because it is a striking image
2. Does it remind you of anything? personal experiences, other photographers work.
It reminds me of the days of the week underwear that many children had growing up... perhaps this is another idea behind the photograph?